Why do I feel invited and wanted; when a blog post talks about abuse within the families of the FALC? Why do I feel they want to hear what those of us who have been abused, have to say. Words about their faith and their non-actions? Even as I type "non-actions" I know they will jump and attack this.
They attack any words or suggestions that shine a negative light upon their church; faith and its members.
How can you have a dialogue about a negative subject and its neglect by so many and not speak in terms that are not favorable.
What I feel they want the most is to discuss abuse within the church, but to leave the church and its teachings and its people alone.
This rang a bell of familiarity this morning, in regards to my family.
Meaning, how can we discuss freely, the abuse WITHIN the family and not dissect and tear apart the family?
This is the trouble with abuse when it happens within families and friends and within families that belong to the same religion.
There is little room to navigate this subject IF you can't talk about the very problem and its source.
Just sit with the fact that they are seeking to break the silence about abuse within the churches families….but let's not speak unkindly.
I was expected to stand against abuse; but not family.
How, when abuse happened within the family.
This is the same strong negative wall that arises when you are trying to discuss abuse within the families of the church. They are not open to criticisms in any way, shape or form. But let's discuss….
Really?
And sadly, the one who is trying to show the evidence, the proof and their failures IS the one who is attacked. I have had years of this already….do I truly need more?
Why do I put myself in the position to be attacked for speaking out?
The answer is the child who is still a child in this system.
I don't want to be the silent compliant adult, who knew and did nothing.
And yet, I can see and feel the pressure of how resistant they still are.
And, of course I am lumping them all together when only a small segment has spoken.
But when I enter into the arena where there is an attempt to open the door upon abuse; the responses are so similar….between the opposing parties. That is why I guess, I say "they" and "all".
My brother did a blog post in 2011, September in fact….and his frustrations of meeting this resistance is so eloquently worded. And Felt.
It shows our caring and trying and our failing.
http://messyguru.typepad.com/messy_guru/2011/09/waiting-for-dorthy-to-call.html
Failing….to get the kind folks of the church to believe enough to rise and organize and revolt; for the children.
Unless and until you try and elicit movement from members, you won't truly know the strength of their resistance. The questions they fail to ask and the things they focus on. It is mind boggling at best and completely tiring at least.
Yet, what keeps me coming back are the children that hang in the balance.
Are we traveling down a road that will open up one day….or is it a brick wall I am beating myself against?
Sometimes I wonder if my silence would have been more beneficial….but it seems I am unable to sit by in silence…when abuse and the FALC are mentioned.
This is a trigger for me.
I want to be part of the movement for change…to be the voice of the voiceless to give a hand to the children who are still in harms way.
There appears to be a very narrow road filled with land mines as we dare to break the silence.
What I feel most will want, is for things to remain the same; but change. For their religion to come out unscathed….while the monsters are taken out.
How?
Is it possible to remove the father and still have a complete family?
Can you poke about in a religion to sew up its holes and not insult someone?
For today…the discussion has yet come to terms as what we can do different. All I have met with so far is what I can do different. I can speak kinder and not make broad assumptions, I can do this and that….
I have to change and the perhaps the churches families will seem kinder…










